Methodological review showed that time-to-event outcomes are often inadequately handled in cluster randomized trials

نویسندگان

چکیده

Objectives To estimate the prevalence of time-to-event (TTE) outcomes in cluster randomized trials (CRTs) and to examine their statistical management. Study design setting We searched PubMed identify primary reports CRTs published six major general medical journals (2013–2018). Nature and, for TTE outcomes, methods sample size, analysis, measures intracluster correlation were extracted. Results A analysis was used 17% (32/184) either as a or secondary outcome sensitivity analysis. Among five with outcome, two accounted both nature size calculation; one reported measure 32 least 44% (14/32) clustering all analyses. identified 12 additional which there at not analyzed might have been preferred. Conclusion are uncommon but appropriate infrequently used. Our results suggest that further methodological development explicit recommendations needed.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On the estimation of intracluster correlation for time-to-event outcomes in cluster randomized trials.

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) involve the random assignment of intact social units rather than independent subjects to intervention groups. Time-to-event outcomes often are endpoints in CRTs. Analyses of such data need to account for the correlation among cluster members. The intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to assess the similarity among binary and continuous outcomes that...

متن کامل

Are missing data adequately handled in cluster randomised trials? A systematic review and guidelines.

BACKGROUND Missing data are a potential source of bias, and their handling in the statistical analysis can have an important impact on both the likelihood and degree of such bias. Inadequate handling of the missing data may also result in invalid variance estimation. The handling of missing values is more complex in cluster randomised trials, but there are no reviews of practice in this field. ...

متن کامل

Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests

BACKGROUND There is a growing recognition for the need to expand our evidence base for the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests. Many international bodies are calling for diagnostic randomized controlled trials to provide the most rigorous evidence of impact to patient health. Although these so-called test-treatment RCTs are very challenging to undertake due to their methodological comple...

متن کامل

Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review

Reviews have repeatedly noted important methodological issues in the conduct and reporting of cluster randomized controlled trials (C-RCTs). These reviews usually focus on whether the intracluster correlation was explicitly considered in the design and analysis of the C-RCT. However, another important aspect requiring special attention in C-RCTs is the risk for imbalance of covariates at baseli...

متن کامل

Analysis of Time to Event Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials by Generalized Additive Models

BACKGROUND Randomized Controlled Trials almost invariably utilize the hazard ratio calculated with a Cox proportional hazard model as a treatment efficacy measure. Despite the widespread adoption of HRs, these provide a limited understanding of the treatment effect and may even provide a biased estimate when the assumption of proportional hazards in the Cox model is not verified by the trial da...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1878-5921', '0895-4356']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.004